Use cases · Advisory, BI & due diligence
For firms that produce for their own clients
How far back goes the history you can produce on a target? This is a capability you resell, not one more tool in your stack.
What sets you apart
Depth, not coverage
On the present, everyone sees roughly the same thing. The gap opens up going backwards, and it cannot be closed: a past you did not collect cannot be bought anywhere.
2012
Continuous collection begins
2016
Forums and marketplaces long gone, preserved
2020
The period's mass leaks, indexed and dated
2026
What a point-in-time scan would see, and no more
A competitor can buy the same data as of today. Nobody can buy the data from ten years ago: it was not collected. Depth, not coverage, decides what you can put in a report.
Continuous collection since 2012. The period examples are illustrative.
The terms
Built to be handed to a third party
White label
The deliverable goes out under your identity. Your client buys your analysis, not our tool.
Redistribution rights
Set out in the contract, so that what you hand to your client is covered end to end.
Source traceability
Every element carries its source and its date. That is the first thing your client will ask you for.
The engagements concerned
Where depth decides
- 01Pre-acquisition due diligence: what the target has exposed, and since when, beyond what it declares.
- 02Business intelligence: the history of a competitor, supplier or intermediary over several years.
- 03Digital forensics: the external chronology that completes what internal logs do not hold.
- 04Compliance and integrity: establishing since when sensitive information was accessible, and to whom.
Add anteriority to your deliverables
One live engagement is enough to measure what depth changes on a report you already produce.