Use cases · Corporate & economic security
For corporate and economic security
How long have this director, this site, this reference been circulating? A network's anteriority is worth more than today's snapshot.
What the archive establishes
What was circulating before the report
People, sites, research assets, product references: what concerns you often appears long before anyone reports it to you.
- 06/2023A director's personal details, in an aggregated batch
- 01/2024Plans of an industrial site, dropped on a file-sharing site
- 08/2024Product reference picked up by a counterfeiting network
- 03/2025Internal report, investigation begins
21months
between first circulation and the internal report. On a counterfeiting case as on a threat to a person, it is the network's anteriority that makes the demonstration.
Schematic. The dates are illustrative and describe no real case.
The perimeter
Four objects, one question
Exposed people
Directors, expatriates, sensitive staff: what has been published about them, and when.
Sites and locations
Plans, procedures, internal photographs circulating outside your walls, with their age.
Strategic assets and R&D
Design documents, code repositories, material covered by trade-secret protection.
Counterfeiting
The age of a network and its outlets, for proceedings on the merits — not for a takedown.
The shape of the deliverable
A case file, not an alert feed
What we hand over here is a document: the elements found, their source, their date of appearance, and what connects those that belong together. It can be read, quoted and passed on — to counsel, to an investigation service, to an executive board.
On a counterfeiting case, the age of a network and its outlets is worth more than an inventory of what is online today: it is what holds up in court, and it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Something to place in time?
A person, a site, a reference: tell us which, and we will tell you what the archive holds and since when.